• Lindgren’s sample grew 2.5× on 2026-08-25 — fifteen tagged games to Thompson’s twelve. One goal now moves his overall save % by about .003. Where the bigger sample moved a number, his slides say so rather than smoothing it over.
• No single game carries his rates any more — 04.05 vs NYR (8 GA on 30 shots) held 38% of his goals in the six-game sample; at fifteen games it holds 16%, and excluding it he is .884 overall.
• Two of his games arrived double-tagged at the source (two video uploads of the same periods). The duplicates — including one double-counted goal — were deleted in the source database on 2026-08-26, along with one save whose only video had died with the stale upload. Every number here is computed after that cleanup.
• Baseline (“NHL pool”) = the other NHL goalies we track — 2,005 shots, includes backups — not a league average. Thompson’s rows always exclude his own shots from the pool.
• The pool contains a 180-shot Thompson sample from GEM’s own earlier tagging (~9% of it), so Lindgren’s baselines are not fully independent of his tandem partner. It never mixes into either goalie’s own numbers on these slides.

• Lindgren carried the heavier per-game load — 26.1 shots per game to Thompson’s 20.7, across fifteen games to Thompson’s twelve, at an identical 30% high-danger share.
• On high-danger itself both sat under the pool: Thompson .693 and Lindgren .669 against roughly .75 for the goalies we track — the tandem’s gap to the pool lives almost entirely in the high-danger tier.
• Fifteen games is a real profile for Lindgren — the six-game caveat this deck first shipped with is retired.

Deflections and screens rest on 20 and 46 shots — comfortable margins on modest populations. Every row on this page excludes his own shots from the pool.

No single game carries more than one of the eight forced-lateral goals — without his heaviest game (03.31 PHI) the area is still .632; that game holds 4 of 26 goals on 8% of his shots, so no rate on this page leans on one night.

• The theme is lateral: 8 of 26 goals on forced lateral movement, and Around leads his beaten chart (6 goals) — when he is beaten, the puck moves him and goes around, not through.
• 17 of 26 goals come from the slot; outside the interior he is at or above the pool nearly everywhere.
• In-tight chaos is a small population but a costly one: 4 goals on 5 such chances.

Fifteen games, 41–207 decided shots per row. Two six-game strengths — the kill (.906) and the dot lane (.938) — settled back to the pool as the sample grew; forced lateral movement, quick release and the rush held above it. The pool for these rows includes an earlier-tagged Thompson sample (~9%); see slide one.

04.05 vs NYR (8 GA) holds 16% of his goals; without it he is .884 — no row on this page leans on one night. Upper glove is .772 without its heaviest game; the zone-entry goals sit in four different games. One-timers moved most with sample size: .879 at six games, .779 at fifteen.

• The organizing theme is sightline and the seam: screens and deflections together are 20 GA on 86 shots (.767, pool .865), five more goals come from the blue line through bodies (.896 vs .970), and set-play one-timers run .779 on 77.
• Upper glove now carries half his goals (25 of 50) — the one exposure he and Thompson share, on an identical filter, and the rate held as the sample tripled.
• His should’ve-had share, 22.0% against the pool’s 13.9%, held as the sample grew from six games to fifteen — no longer small-sample noise. Flagged for coach review.